1992 Marvel Masterpieces vs The Movies (Part 2)

This is a continuation of my series of the 1992 Marvel Masterpieces card set, which I consider to be the greatest comic book card set in history. I told my personal story on the last blog and set off to see how well the 1992 set predicted the look of the films.

dad777de2d8cee4a2e4583f25ba5fd4c.jpgloki617F.jpg

Loki has been in three movies so far. The look is pretty close, however the movie version is less maniacal looking. The horns are there (although it looks more like ram horns than the card version) but the little dongle on top of the helmet is missing. I am unsure what is going on with the hands on the card (is that yellow paint or some really thin gloves? For the most part, it was a decent effort.

. 44417ffb7c63183dc0d3c6602cd16a9c.jpgScreen Shot 2016-04-14 at 6.15.10 PM.png

Bishop was one of my favorite characters of X-Men when I was eleven years old. He was this badass that traveled from the future to try and prevent the horror of mutant armageddon. In the movie version of the same story, they created this dude that couldn’t look more lame. It was almost as if Bryan Singer didn’t give a shit and just aid “hey, just give the guy a gun and a red cape.” The Bishop from the card would have been so much better. It hinted that he was a little bit flashy but ready to save the world.

3b6228f6cd8ee0efa80cbdca72b91ac8.jpgUltron_EW_Poster.png

Ultron appears in the second Avengers movie. It appears as though the fit was pretty close to the 1992 card. I think the movie version (although in a nonsensical plot) looks much cooler and believable than the silver-surferish look on the card. The movie version is more diabolical looking.

mm32.jpgScreen Shot 2016-04-14 at 6.14.12 PM.png

Hulk looks like a solid match. The hair is a bit more crazy on the card, but the movie has a more recognizable look. The muscles are ripping and the facial anger is noticeable. Hulk has appeared in 4 movies so far, and each time looked like I imagined in 1992.

8d5ad7b7f8353787af0f843a7398a958.jpgScreen Shot 2016-04-14 at 6.10.36 PM.png

Dr. Strange was a character I didn’t pay much attention to in 1992. All I could tell is that he looked into some orb. To be honest, I wasn’t familiar with the character until the Dr.Strange trailer was released. It appears some effort was made to match the look. The movie version doesn’t quite have the gray hair and an over-the-top collar, but the goatee is in fact there.

1992 Marvel Masterpieces vs The Movies

joe-jusko-nsu-ad.jpg

I still remember when I saw this on the back of a comic book. Wow. When you are like 11 years old and a huge comic book fan during the peak of baseball card collecting, there was no better idea in the world than combining the two and making comic book cards. To me and my friends back in the day, the 1992 Marvel Masterpieces set was the set of all sets to collect. I still remember going to the store to buy them.

You see, nobody knew how huge of a hit these cards would be, so the stores didn’t pre-order a ton. So as kids, the only place to get them in a fifty mile radius was this grungy card store shop (remember those) where we would go in and some fat and smelly dude would eye you the entire time as if we would ruin his merchandise. I remember my first visit, there was a rookie Michael Jordan basketball card in the case for $50. My dad was like “Hey, what about that?” I shook my head in disdain. Nobody collected basketball cards. Marvel, now that was where the action was at.

So I plunked down $10 for 4 backs of this sweet set. I went home and opened them with my brother watching on and discovered we had just bought (co-investment opportunity, of course) 24 marvel cards, but didn’t hit the big home run which were hologram cards (the only time to admit as a boy to like sparkly things). Damn. I showed the other kids on the block and they of course had to buy some and before I knew it, I was smack dab in the middle of a ponzi scheme of some sort.

Each time I returned to the shop, the prices skyrocketed. Two weeks later it was $3 a pack. Then $3.50. Then $4. Then $4.50. The fat and smelly guy was raking in a good profit per box thinking the good times were never gonna end. (Ironically, these tactics kind of contributed to crushing the hobby. When all was said and done, I owned the entire set and all the holograms. I don’t know much it is worth, nor do I care. They are in a box somewhere in my house and represent a part of my childhood.

Thus, with the craze that Marvel comic book movies have been the last decade, I thought it would be funny to see how accurate the 1992 set depicted the characters that would eventually hit the silver screen the following 25 years. I plan to continue the series in the weeks and months ahead.

f731b9dd47f9f6a4c3ecc3dcc0554ba2.jpgScreen Shot 2016-04-10 at 8.41.54 PM.png

Apocalypse was adapted pretty faithfully for the movies. His face is a little different, blue vs white, but the color and armor are pretty darn close. I don’t know if he can summon a green fireball in his hands, since the movie isn’t released yet, but hey, it sure looks pretty faithful to me.

e878a19bdde09aaff1ac61971abad46d.jpgScreen Shot 2016-04-10 at 8.51.06 PM.png

Sandman looked the part for a little bit. An attempt was made to match the t-shirt and hair color. The only problem was that after Spider Man danced on the tables and destroyed the franchise, the Sandman became the Sandmonster in an nonsensical ending.

879bd38827a48b47b879a409ff31e94c.jpgScreen Shot 2016-04-10 at 8.58.10 PM.png

Hawkeye was just okay to me. The bow wasn’t as bad ass and just look at his arrow. Pretty damn weak in the movie. On the 1992 card, I could imagine that thing blowing up something huge. And what’s up with having no mask? Does the movie Hawkeye not care about his identity? Does he like the wind to flow through his hair? The movie fails a little bit in the mask department.

74917-5318956Fr.jpgprofx_by_maddymew-d85drbc.jpg

Professor X pretty much was nailed. There is no argument about that. They even got the blazer and tie going. If I was to nitpick, his wheel chair in the movie looks a bit more slick. But good on the film getting the look right.

74917-5318970Fr.jpgScreen Shot 2016-04-10 at 9.26.04 PM.png

Red Skull is a little bit off. The card has more teeth and a skeletal look to him and the eyes filled up his entire socket, but nonetheless, the adaptation was pretty close. The more fleshy-red look was suitable to get Hugo Weaving’s acting chops to show up rather than some CGI bullshit.

CONTINUE WITH THE NEXT BATCH OF COMPARISONS…

https://mmleonard.com/2016/04/14/1992-marvel-masterpieces-vs-the-movies-part-2/